<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16640" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=358075510-22052008>I had ... and had started
some not so nice comments about them and their photography ... I mean just that
its peta alone was enough to turn me off of going through the site ... but even
though they have their past of blowing things out of proportion, I still had to
look for any validity... </SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=358075510-22052008></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=358075510-22052008>its not that there aren't
valid issues there ... but as soon as peta says it.. I have to question the
validity ... since they would post what appears to be the worst of any situation
and try to gather a bandwagon around their agenda.</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=358075510-22052008></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=358075510-22052008>The FDA inspection that
they post is more concrete ... but dated so old.. (2005) don't knwo if
they've reformed any..</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=358075510-22052008></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=358075510-22052008></SPAN> </DIV><BR>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Dailydrool] IAMS What Everyone Should
Know<BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV></DIV><FONT id=role_document face=Arial>
<DIV>I have no feelings regarding Iams, as I do not feed it. However, I
wonder if anyone noticed that the site which </DIV>
<DIV>was mentioned in the above section of the drool was supported by
PETA?</DIV></FONT>
<DIV> </DIV></BODY></HTML>