<div dir="ltr">The slow-kill method was tried on Matilda back in January. By May, she had a severe case of heartworms with some lung damage. <div><br></div><div>I questioned the slow-kill method in January but I was told by the rescue coordinator that it was recommended by a vet. When I told my regular vet about using the slow-kill method, he was very concerned. He couldn't understand why a young seemingly healthy dog was treated with the slow-kill method. My vet prefers the protocol from the American Heartworm Association - which advocates usage of drugs like Immiticide (sp?). </div>
<div><br></div><div>I pushed the rescue for the correct heartworm procedure for Matilda in May. After 30 days of recommended antibiotics, the injections were given in June and July. I adopted Matilda the day I brought her home from her last treatment.</div>
<div><br></div><div>When I see Matilda panting heavily because of the lung damage, I get a little frustrated that the correct heartworm protocol was not followed on her. To my knowledge, she was the only heartworm positive foster treated with the slow kill method in the last few years by this rescue. Heartworm positive dogs were treated using the Immiticide injections - except for Matilda. It was one of my reasons for walking away from that rescue. </div>
<div><br></div><div>Looking back it was a good thing that Matilda's two adoptions failed. The adoptive families might not have realized that her heartworms were not under control by the slow-kill method and that the heavy panting was a sign of lung problems not just because of summer temperatures.<br>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>Please make sure your dogs get their monthly heartworm preventative. Remember most manufacturers will pay for the treatment if your dog becomes heartworm positive while on their preventative (of course there are restrictions).</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">Jan</div><div class="gmail_quote">Lady, Dexter and Matilda</div></div></div></div>