[Dailydrool] Lulu

[Esther Strom]

I don't see anything wrong with this. Most vets are the equivalent of 
human GP's, not specialists. If there was something questionable in a 
biopsy I had done, I'd certainly want my doctor to check with someone 
who has specialized training in reading biopsy results. I do agree that 
there needs to be better communication from the vet, but do not think 
that firing the vet is warranted unless there have been other issues as 
well.


On 6/6/12 11:30 AM, Beverly Szaton wrote:
> The Vet is going to check back with the pathologist. He has no idea 
> what the heck he is doing. I am enraged!! Can you tell? I would fire 
> his butt.
> Take a hike. Find someone who knows what he or she is doing. PLEASE.
> MomPerson who believes Vets and doctors and lawyers should know what 
> the hell they're talking about. Or at the least, know more than I do.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.dailydrool.org/pipermail/dailydrool-dailydrool.org/attachments/20120611/b19d4f64/attachment-0002.htm>